Skip to content

Points Frog guide

Xiamen Airlines Egret Miles vs Bangkok Airways FlyerBonus

Bangkok Airways FlyerBonus points are worth more as of October 13, 2026: an estimated 1¢ each against 0.9¢ for Xiamen Airlines Egret Miles, 11% more per point. 50,000 come to about $500 against $450.

Values updated

Xiamen Airlines Egret Miles vs Bangkok Airways FlyerBonus, side by side
MeasureXiamen Airlines Egret MilesBangkok Airways FlyerBonus
Value per point0.9¢1¢
10,000 worth$90$100
50,000 worth$450$500
100,000 worth$900$1,000
A great award1.08¢ or more a point1.2¢ or more a point
A poor awardunder 0.81¢ a pointunder 0.9¢ a point
Rewards currencymilespoints
Run byXiamen AirlinesBangkok Airways
Ranked16 of 34, Asia64 of 102, airline miles10 of 34, Asia39 of 102, airline miles

Values are Points Frog's estimates of one point redeemed for good, available awards, not cash-out or transfer rates. How we value points.

Xiamen Airlines Egret Miles

Bangkok Airways FlyerBonus

Quick answers

Which is worth more, Xiamen Airlines Egret Miles or Bangkok Airways FlyerBonus?

Bangkok Airways FlyerBonus points are worth more as of October 13, 2026: an estimated 1¢ each against 0.9¢ for Xiamen Airlines Egret Miles, 11% more per point. 50,000 come to about $500 against $450.

How many Xiamen Airlines Egret Miles equal 50,000 Bangkok Airways FlyerBonus points?

About 55,556. At 0.9¢ each, that many miles match the $500 estimated for 50,000 points at 1¢. This compares value only; the programs do not exchange points at this rate.

Is a higher value per point always better?

No. A program worth less per point can still win if it earns more points per dollar or per flight, or if its awards fly where you want to go. Compare what you would earn on your own spending and the awards you would book before choosing between Xiamen Airlines Egret Miles and Bangkok Airways FlyerBonus.

Where do these values come from?

Points Frog's valuation catalog estimates what one point is worth when redeemed for good, available travel awards, in US cents. It is an editorial average, not a cash-out rate, and each program's page shows its dated valuation history.

More head-to-heads