Skip to content

Points Frog guide

airasia rewards vs Vietnam Airlines Lotusmiles

Vietnam Airlines Lotusmiles are worth more as of October 13, 2026: an estimated 0.5¢ each against 0.3¢ for airasia rewards points, 67% more per point. 50,000 come to about $250 against $150.

Values updated

airasia rewards vs Vietnam Airlines Lotusmiles, side by side
Measureairasia rewardsVietnam Airlines Lotusmiles
Value per point0.3¢0.5¢
10,000 worth$30$50
50,000 worth$150$250
100,000 worth$300$500
A great award0.36¢ or more a point0.6¢ or more a point
A poor awardunder 0.27¢ a pointunder 0.45¢ a point
Rewards currencypointsmiles
Run byAirAsiaVietnam Airlines
Ranked33 of 34, Asia101 of 102, airline miles31 of 34, Asia96 of 102, airline miles

Values are Points Frog's estimates of one point redeemed for good, available awards, not cash-out or transfer rates. How we value points.

airasia rewards

Vietnam Airlines Lotusmiles

Quick answers

Which is worth more, airasia rewards or Vietnam Airlines Lotusmiles?

Vietnam Airlines Lotusmiles are worth more as of October 13, 2026: an estimated 0.5¢ each against 0.3¢ for airasia rewards points, 67% more per point. 50,000 come to about $250 against $150.

How many airasia rewards points equal 50,000 Vietnam Airlines Lotusmiles?

About 83,333. At 0.3¢ each, that many points match the $250 estimated for 50,000 miles at 0.5¢. This compares value only; the programs do not exchange points at this rate.

Is a higher value per point always better?

No. A program worth less per point can still win if it earns more points per dollar or per flight, or if its awards fly where you want to go. Compare what you would earn on your own spending and the awards you would book before choosing between airasia rewards and Vietnam Airlines Lotusmiles.

Where do these values come from?

Points Frog's valuation catalog estimates what one point is worth when redeemed for good, available travel awards, in US cents. It is an editorial average, not a cash-out rate, and each program's page shows its dated valuation history.

More head-to-heads